Life Music Movies Television
 
Digital Books Today School
 
 
 
 
 
Drinking Age to Go Back to Eighteen?   Aug 20, 2008  
 

Underage drinking seems like a fact of life on many college campuses around the country, and how could it not be? A majority of the students are under the legal age of twenty-one, on their own for the first time in their lives, and looking to have some fun and live out their own Animal House dreams. And, conveniently enough, many of their classmates are able to buy alcohol and supply their parties! Wicked cool! I’m not saying it’s right or legal, only that it happens. But recently, a drinking age initiative has been making the rounds that calls for a national debate on lowering the legal age back down to eighteen. I, for one, am all for it.

What good will it do? you may ask. Perhaps you think that it will simply create a new class of underage drinkers—the fifteen- to seventeen-year-olds. Newsflash: many of them are drinking already. Lowering the drinking age to eighteen, however, will make college less about finally being able to drink. It will introduce them to alcohol at a younger age and allow them to get over the excitement of it.

Teens are notorious for wanting what they can’t have, and often overindulging in whatever that may be. Heck, humans are known for wanting what they can’t have! And so, many underage students go a little crazy with the alcohol whenever they get a chance (so pretty much every weekend). There’s a risk and excitement involved that goes way beyond that little buzz and has a lot to do with being “bad.” If you all of a sudden make drinking “okay,” it’s going to lose a little of that edge, and many students will drink less frequently, or at least in smaller quantities.

Moana Jagasia, a sophomore at Duke, offered the following: “There isn’t that much difference in maturity between twenty-one and eighteen. If the age is younger, you’re getting exposed to it at a younger age, and you don’t freak out when you get to campus.”

At least, that’s the idea behind the Amethyst Initiative’s plan. For the past few years they’ve been quietly getting very important people to sign on—college presidents. And it’s not just little, unknown colleges who are getting involved, but rather presidents from Tufts, Dartmouth, Ohio State, and Syracuse. Many of them signed on simply to get the debate going, and not to necessarily ask for eighteen to become the new twenty-one. They simply recognize that underage drinking is a problem that needs to be addressed. Research has shown that more than 40 percent of college students have some symptoms of alcohol abuse, and 1,700 die annually from alcohol-related accidents. This isn’t an issue that should be ignored.

The Amethyst Initiative’s statement also points out that you become a legal adult at age eighteen, and are called upon to act as a member of society through voting in elections and military service. There seems to be some disconnect with allowing people to vote for their leaders and fight for their country, and yet not allowing them to drink alcohol. How can a person not want to act out against a society that doesn’t entirely respect them as adults, and how can they respect laws that are so contradictory? The Amethyst Initiative aims to find out.

What do you think? What should the drinking age be? Is underage drinking a problem at your school?

Photo credit: selectroclash.wordpress.com

 
Posted in Life by april | Link | Comments (73) |
 
 
Weekly Poll
 
Loading ... Loading ...
The secret word is
 

 
 
 
 
 
Comments
 
 

the legal age of drinking will have no effect on whether or not people drink. if the drinking age were raised to 25, people younger than that would still drink, often to excess; if the drinking age were lowered to 18, it would likely not change anything. if alcohol were prohibited altogether, everyone who would drink would still do so. as time and current events have shown, people generally lack any measure of responsibility. in that respect, perhaps we are more hedonistic than we care to admit as we endeavour to do what we please. why would alcohol (or other drugs) be any different??

the three year gap between the age of legal responsibility (18) and the legal drinking age (21) has never made sense to me. at 18, a person is considered an adult. he/she can choose government/civic leaders. he/she can choose whether or not to fight and die for his/her country. he/she would be held accountable in a court of law for crimes commited and damages incurred. why is it that 18 year olds cannot drink?? this seems to be a mixed message–you are old enough for the weightier matters of responsibility, but you are too young to determine whether .

the crux of this debate seems to lie in one capacity to be responsible. the central question, therefore is this–are 18 year olds responsible enough to drink?? the question that should be examined is this–what determines one’s accountability?? is it age?? if it is, which criteria are considered to establish a responsible age??

personally, i believe that 18 is too young. i have yet to meet an 18 year-old with a functional concept of responsibility. with the exception of very few, 18 year-olds are still learning their place in society. they are inexperienced professionally and practically. it often takes two or three years of college and being out on their own to develop this concept. the same is true for many 19, 20, and 21 year olds. current events are replete with people who have no sense of accountability as we tend to disregard the consequences of our actions. responsibility and accountability, therefore, are virtues that must be taught and practiced. they do not magically appear when someone turns 18, 21, 25, or 92.

however, for the sake of this arguement, it matters not if the drinking age is lowered to 18. the bottom line of this issue is that people will do what they will. the only thing that can be done to foment more responsible behaviour is to hold people accountable for their actions, regardless of age. lower the drinking age. police would no longer have to worry whether or not college freshmen are drinking in dorm rooms. it seems to me that their energies can be better focused elsewhere, but that is another discussion….

[1] Posted by: Outryder | August 20th, 2008 at 6:50 pm
 

Where i’m from the legal drinking age IS eighteen and underage drinking is a huge problem. I personally don’t think that a drinking age actually does anything. Somebody always has a lax parent or an older sibling that can purchase alcohol for them. The only solution really is education!

[2] Posted by: starfishnz | August 20th, 2008 at 7:20 pm
 

I am from Germany where the drinking age is 16 and 18 for hard liquor. In germany, I noticed, there is less \’binge drinking\’ on weekends, and less alcohol related accidents. In America, however, binge drinking is a common practice among highschoolers and college students alike. By lowering the drinking age to eighteen, it can be certain that the fun of alcohol will be not as fun as it used to be. There will certainly be a drop in the amount of binge drinking and alcohol related deaths. I am totally for the drinking age to be lowered to eighteen.

[3] Posted by: emilycmca | August 20th, 2008 at 10:07 pm
 

Sure, if we lower the drinking age to eighteen, the said “excitement” would be simmered-down at a younger age, but what if it doesn’t?
What if at the age of eighteen, people begin to think that drinking is alright, that drinking is acceptable to splurge yourself without getting in any trouble.
Maybe some eighteen-year olds, will not become alcoholics, in their older ages. However alcoholic drinks are addictive; and in a way getting addicted at such a important point in one’s life can cause consequences. At eighteen, sure you’re being accepted as adults; but, your brain is not yet fully grown. Your brain doesn’t stop growing until age 27, but society decides that drinking is legal. People are hurting themselves, but in way people want to.
As for me, I am a fan of alcohol, and I am under the age of 21. But what stops me from drinking is the law. I don’t always be obedient the law, but in this case I do, for it seems fit.
For me, I like the taste. However in your argument you skip over the fact what happens if people under the age of 21, like the taste? It is not the excitement about going against “the man”, but rather the product. People would start drinking at 18 and continue.
Drinking isn’t safe, and people decide to drink. Rather peer pressure, or just enjoyment. Even though it may not seem to be helpful with being an adult , but in way you can be much more mature.

[4] Posted by: Milanogirl14 | August 22nd, 2008 at 11:24 am
 

I am all for the drinking age being lowered to 18. People are in most, if not all other cases considered legally an adult. You can vote, you can buy cigarettes, you can be shipped off to war, you can buy a lighter, you can live on your own, heck, you can even sign your life away. By lowering the drinking age to 18, you will reduce the number of college kids binge drinking in their basement. All over Europe, kids are aloud to drink, some countries have no drinking age, and they are just taught responsible drinking habits. And most are let to over drink once, so they know what it\’s like, and most of them will never do it again. Now, I’m not saying that we should get rid of the drinking age, but I don’t have any problem with lowering to to 18.

[5] Posted by: ErElKi | August 24th, 2008 at 8:11 pm
 

I’d go for lowering the drinking age to 18. We’ve got so much other drinking and partying happening - maybe if the age is lowered it won’t be considered so taboo. I agree with ErEIKi. When you’re 18, you’re a legal adult. As long as the education about drinking is well-taught and focuses on responsibility, lowering the drinking age to 18 isn’t going to give us any problems. It might make things better.

[6] Posted by: DownWeFall666 | August 25th, 2008 at 11:07 am
 

I think that 18 year olds should be able to drink. If you are thought to be mature enough to die for your country at 18 than ehy wouldn\’t you be mature wnough to drink. Between the ages 18 and 21 not much really changes. People are always going to do what they want, and kids want exitement. If drinking is illegal than they will just do more of it. My only real fear is that if the drinking age is lowered that kids will still want to do what they aaren\’t aloud to, wich would be drugs.

[7] Posted by: 3Bean3 | August 26th, 2008 at 2:22 am
 

NO I do not think that the drinking age should be lowered to eighteen. There is aleady enough people under the age who are drinking that are about seventeen and eighteen years old and if the drinking age is lowered people who are fiteen and sixteen might think that their age is close to the real drinking age and would want to drink because they think that its not that bad because they are “almost” eighteen. I think it would be worse for people graduating high school because there would be even more alcohol at the parties and the parents would allow it because it is legal. I think that lowering the drinking age to eighteen would encourage more people to drink alcohol!

[8] Posted by: ladybug218 | August 26th, 2008 at 9:13 pm
 

The idea of 3 years between adulthood and drinking gives a person time to mature outside school. Usually in that time, a student can be out of school and out on their own. Once they realize that getting drunk is pure folly, they will be able to drink socially and not in excess, and still be able to go to work or church the next day.

[9] Posted by: gottaloveskillet | August 27th, 2008 at 9:13 am
 

well…i dont approve of drinking at any time of life really. maybe a glass of wine with dinner? but other than that it’s ridiculous. but everyone does it anyways. idk…i dont think it will change anything no matter what the drinking age is. but i still say keep it at 21.

[10] Posted by: HippyChill22 | September 2nd, 2008 at 10:48 pm
 

Laws are good, and they\’re not there to boss you around. One cannot think, \

[11] Posted by: ClayVMcD | September 4th, 2008 at 3:27 pm
 

Laws are good, and they’re not there to boss you around. One can’t think, “This law’s being broken anyway, may as well get rid of it”, because EVERY law is being broken anyway. We can’t legalize murder just because it happens several times a day, if we did the murder rate would explode(no crime goes down as a result of it’s no longer being forbidden), as would alcohol related crimes, accidents and diseases if the drinking age is pushed back. You say this idea would make college less about “finally being able to drink.” No, it would make HIGHSCHOOL about “finally being able to drink”, and college about “finally being able to LEGALLY drink.” You imply, “Why shouldn’t a teenager-who can drive, vote, die, and marry-drink?” One could also ask,”Why can’t a teenager-who can vote, and etc.-buy a deadly weapon?” The answer is he’s not ready. If less people get in trouble for it, and are told it’s okay, more people will do it, including people who don’t already. You may not realize it, but you want to play reverse psychology with American law.

[12] Posted by: ClayVMcD | September 4th, 2008 at 4:04 pm
 

yeah, the drinking age should definitely NOT be put at age 18, and theres SO many reasons why, i think all the people who said “go ahead and do it” are ABSOLUTELY NUTS! (no offense :)) First off, lets play the “play out the made up situation” game. im 13 years old. my older brother is 18. normally, he wouldnt be able to buy alcohol for me for my 14th bday party, but now i give him a 50 bucks and he goes to the store and fills the trunk of his car with booze and gives it to us. everyones drunk, i steal my dads car, and BAM! You, the responsible sober person i hit, gets a large piece of metal from my car embeded in your skull. sounds pretty messed up, and believe me, as dumb as i made the situation sound, its more common than one would think. and u can tweak and adjust this situation as much as u want, make me older, give me a license, change my brother to a senior in my high school, it still plays out with you either dying or being in a generally unpleasant situation. heres the main point… I DONT CARE ABOUT THE KID GETTING DRUNK OR HIS LITTLE WASTED FRIENDS, THEYRE IRRESPONSIBLE, THERE LIFE IS FORFEITED. i care about wut would happen to the people around them as a result of it. THINK OF YOURSELF FIRST, i know i dont want to be scrunched up between the bent metal and broken glass of an accident because some dumb kid was given access to alcohol. and i dont think im being selfish, i think im being an average member of the human race
PS- for all the people who keep saying “you can vote, you can be in the military, you can marry”, none of those things could kill me or you directly, so i dont think theyre valid excuses.

[13] Posted by: painface87 | September 6th, 2008 at 6:29 pm
 

i think that lowering the drinking age would be worse than keeping it same, unless all the consequences were taught, and kids knew when to stop. but kids generally dont know when to stop.

[14] Posted by: broadwaynerdd | September 6th, 2008 at 7:24 pm
 

I think that this is a great idea, that will lower drinking problems significantly. If you think about it most 18 year-olds are still in high school, and still live with their parents, also, most people tend to go wild with the drinking immediately when it becomes legal for them(21): however, if the drinking age were lowered to 18 any wild abuse of alcohol would happen in a place where parents are more likely to be, and this would provide a little more protection for any people who are new to drinking. Most parents will agree that they would rather have their children make mistakes while they can still help them out, rather than when they are off on their own.

[15] Posted by: dramadude999 | September 6th, 2008 at 8:40 pm
 

they may as well do it, people drink anyway, it’ll be legal, but it probably won’t happen because they need a way to make money…which could go either way, they should change it though

[16] Posted by: personaljesus420 | September 7th, 2008 at 1:19 am
 

The whole reason the drinking age was raised to 21 is because in 1982, when the Regean changed it, the voting age was 21. But just because the voting age has been lowered doesn’t mean the drinking age should be too. Statistics show (check out http://www.udetc.org) that the number of alcohol related deaths, accidents, and injuries have dramatically decreased since the 80s. I can even tell the higher age law has worked when i hear my parents talk about all their friends that have died because of alcohol compared with the people in my current community.

And you can actually drink if you’re in the military, as long as your commander permits it and is willing to take full responsibility of you. But here’s the thing: they know better.

In my state, parents are allowed to serve alcohol to THEIR OWN CHILD in THEIR OWN HOME which reduced the excitement of drinking for me. Of course this may not work with the less responsible parents, but i think its a lot better than lowering the drinking age.

[17] Posted by: goodluck92 | September 7th, 2008 at 7:45 pm
 

I agree the drinking age should be lowered to 18. I know many high school students that drink just because they know they can get away with it, and because it\’s so taboo to older people. They get a rise out of old people by drinking, they know that and they love it! Giving them the extra attn is the problem. I agree that education is the most important part no matter the legal age. But considering we can do pretty much everything in this country once we turn 18, its ridiculous to say we aren\’t old enough or mature enough. And you have to think, is age really the factor we should use to decide things like this?

[18] Posted by: mikele09 | September 18th, 2008 at 12:48 pm
 

I don’t think the drinking age should be lowered to 18. Why?-Obviously more destruction of teens and society will grow at least one percent everytime a teen gets into a car while intoxicated. If the teen is mature enough to get a ride from a friend/adult whoever is with them and sober then that will be a bypass.
It truly depends on the teen and his/her mentality… morals/values character etc.
I guess we’ll just see how society plays out…

[19] Posted by: sallyRAWRAWRruko | September 18th, 2008 at 2:18 pm
 

I’m form New Zealand(near Australia) and when we lowered our diring age from 20 to 18 alcahol problems went WAY up. It does have a effect.

[20] Posted by: hot_male1900 | September 21st, 2008 at 6:50 am
 

I think that binge drinking is a matter of culture, rather than law. Whether the age is 18, 19 or 21, the fact is that it\’s a major part of our culture to drink. Although the arguments that lowering the drinking age will help to reduce the night-time thrill of illegal drinking are logical, I don\’t think that any significant statistical change will appear in the short-term. Perhaps over time, the level of underage drinking will decrease when the novelty of drinking has decreased. I live in a country where the legal drinking age is 18, and it doesn\’t make a flying difference whether it\’s 18 or 21…I started drinking when I was 16 and quickly became disillusioned by the supposed novelty of alcohol. I think it\’s more important to start a dialogue about drinking. Maybe lowering the age will help with that.

[21] Posted by: m_a_d | September 23rd, 2008 at 7:03 am
 

Old habits die hard, but the US has the highest drinking age, and the biggest under age drinking problem. I guess if they lowered it people would still go back to their ways of under age drinking, but it it worth a try.

[22] Posted by: smileplease7 | September 25th, 2008 at 4:14 pm
 

I was drinking at eighteen because it was legal then. See nothing happened to me, I am just a normal 48 year old spending my time on spark life. I am an example of what drunken american youth have the potential to become.

[23] Posted by: nitaree | September 27th, 2008 at 7:20 am
 

i think that it doesn’t really matter if it is changed or no because if kids want to drink then they will find a way i think that 21 if a more responsible age to drink but then again who am i to say, i had my first drink at the age of 12yrs.

[24] Posted by: tbrits | September 29th, 2008 at 1:54 am
 

I truly believe that lowering the drinking age to 18 will have no effect on underage drinking. If you lower the drinking age, all it will do is open a door for more markets to target younger individuals and apply pressure through advertising. The reason that there is so much underage drinking going on in the United States is certain music and other media that broadcasts a message that drinking is cool and will make you really cool. That’s not true at all. I think that it’s really great that there’s a group of college staff that are acknowledging the problem and working to find a way to cap it, but this isn’t the solution. The solution would be to try and have parents talk to them before they are exposed through misleading media content

[25] Posted by: jasewatson | September 29th, 2008 at 2:11 am
 

The drinking age is 21 because people believe that will stop dui\\\’s of young people. If at 18 you can fight for your country you should be able to drink. If the laws were ENFORCED the drinking age should be 18. Like if there was more severe consequences for Drinking and Driving, there would be less DRINKING and driving and more responsible drinking. I know someone who has 7 DUI\\\’s, and the worst consequences the person faced was 30 days in a annex and a revoked lisense. revoking lisenses doesnt always stop potential drunk drivers.

[26] Posted by: bjam92 | September 29th, 2008 at 8:27 am
 

i think that alcohol should never have been invented. it has ruined plenty of people’s lives. including mine. my mom is a real bad alcoholic and it’s really hard to deal with. kids growing up these days shouldn’t have to deal with alcoholic parents

[27] Posted by: lilbit0004 | September 29th, 2008 at 1:49 pm
 

Survey any country with a low drinking age and you will discover a huge drinking problem in large amount of youth. I personally would never drink in the first place but for those that can not help themselves the law should remain in place. I personally fail to see what is “adult” about drinking alchoholic beverages. It is just better to not be mentally and emotionally as well as physically impaired. (even slightly!)

[28] Posted by: underground_cat | September 29th, 2008 at 2:53 pm
 

if i can die for my country at 18 i should be able to get drunk at 18 dang it there is no certain age where u will drink responsably cause i know 60 year olds who can’t hold their beer an i know 13 year olds who can

[29] Posted by: GreenDuece | October 2nd, 2008 at 2:51 pm
 

I think the drinking age now is perfectly acceptable. If lowered, all it would do is make it seem ok for younger kids to drink. I know 16 year olds that would make exscuses such as, “well only 2 more years till i can drink, what’s the big deal if i do it now?” at least at age 21 you are mature enough to handle your descions and the consequences that go along with that. At 18 you might not have had enough experience in the world yet.

[30] Posted by: loverlymiss | October 3rd, 2008 at 11:53 am
 

I dont think it should be lowered.

[31] Posted by: dagrun | October 4th, 2008 at 1:15 pm
 

the way i see it is young people are going to drink no matter the age. and yes if you lower it more people will probably drink and drive worse than they already do. but if you can go serve and DIE for your country at the age of 18 then how come you cant have a beer at 18!! young adults are going to drink anyways. why not change the drinking age!!

[32] Posted by: hooterville2006 | October 4th, 2008 at 6:21 pm
 

I live in brazil, here the legal drinking age is 18. but the driving age is 18 as well. during the last 5 months, 3 people who were of my social circle died in drunk driving accidents. here, i see friends of my friends who are 13 and 12 and already start drinking, its ridiculous. younger teens, here, are starting a life at 13 what they should start doing at 18, 19.. then i ask myself, what will happen when they reach the age of 18? however there is someone to blame, the education and the government. here, little is enforced.. you could buy off a cop so they wont take you to prison.. now, a law was passed, where if you are caught drinking and driving, and your alcohol level is higher than 1,2, you are arrested and the crime is considered the same thing as murder. the thing is, many of my friends still drink and drive, and many still pay the cop so he ignores that they are drunk . if the drinking age is 18 instead of 21, the same problems will still exist, but i think that the problems will just start at a younger generation.

[33] Posted by: juvalle | October 5th, 2008 at 5:17 pm
 

Sure might as well, they do it anyway and I agree it might not be as exciting if it\’s legal. We can vote at 18. I\’m 26 now and I dont drink as much as i did when i was 18, because as you get older you realize you have responsiblities that are more important.

[34] Posted by: blizzygizzy | October 7th, 2008 at 12:14 pm
 

Ok, Im underage and I drink, I smoke stogies and I love to party. That DOES NOT mean im irresponsible, I get where im going to be for the night and i leave my keys on the counter. That is the problem with drinking, driving afterwards, if you are at a house and your going nowhere untill you have a good nights sleep, then there is no harm. You dont need to be 21 to do that, if people would just lighten up and get over the fact that their little baby is now knocking back brews, then we wouldnt be having this problem.

The reason we need to change the drinking age is because weve become to PC, If i get pulled over with beer in the car I get an MIP, that screws up my chances for college, hurts my wallet on court fees and just gives me a headache I dont need. Back in the 70’s if a couple of kids got cought with beer(at least in Texas) the cops would take the beer home(free beer for the cops) or they would make you pour it out and go home…nobody’s life got turned upside down.

Get over it, stop being PC, and just live your own life.

[35] Posted by: Zenithxx27 | October 7th, 2008 at 9:39 pm
 

In India there is no legal drinking limit. At least I think there isn\’t. No one ever talks of any becuase a kid can go into a store and buy whiskey if he wants. Actually, many of the men try to get the young boys to drink. It\’s like a passage to manhood. (That also leads to the fact that it is considered imoral for a girl to drink though.)

[36] Posted by: rawr7963 | October 7th, 2008 at 10:24 pm
 

yeah i think its pretty much bull shit if you can go to iraq and die for your country which i plan on doing (not dying, going to iraq) but i don’t see how you could spill your blood on foreign soil but not be allowed to drink if you were to leave an arm there

[37] Posted by: mww09 | October 10th, 2008 at 9:42 am
 

im 14 and i really wouldn’t care if it got pushed back because i still gotta wait, you know??

[38] Posted by: IngeJordan | October 10th, 2008 at 10:25 am
 

I think it should be lowered to eighteen. If you can serve your country you should be able to make a decision to drink a beer!!!! I think if your an adult at eighteen then the law should treat them like one.

[39] Posted by: 09edmsiton | October 10th, 2008 at 12:00 pm
 

no, id give it a solid no because eighteen year olds are stupid. if they end up drinking anyway, let them, if they don’t, well, that’s a plus, right?

[40] Posted by: albusseverus | October 11th, 2008 at 7:54 pm
 

If you can die for your country at the age of 18, than why not drink. Besides kids are going to drink any way. When you are 18 you drink just as much as you would when you are 21. The only difference is worring about getting screwed by the cops. So let kids drink cause their ganna do it no matter what the law says. Plus the drinking age in france is 16 and ours is 21. Now dont get me wrong I HATE the french but they deffienatly got 1 thing write.

[41] Posted by: ishka44 | October 12th, 2008 at 8:05 pm
 

Well the real problem is that people don’t learn how to drink responsibly in America, whereas in France, parents teach their children to drink at a young age mainly so that they know and can drink safely (and for the record that isn’t the only thing that the French do right). Previously in the USA’s history there has been a younger drinking age, it was 18 for beer and wine, but 21 for liquor, which seems reasonable. If an 18 year old can drive a humvee into Baghdad why can’t he have a beer at night?

[42] Posted by: amymac580 | October 13th, 2008 at 5:12 pm
 

I don’t understand how lowering the drinking age to 18 makes it “less stressful” for a college student. When I was 18 and in college, having a drink was the last thing on my mind causing me stress. I was worried about studying and getting my education more than what age I could be to legally go out and buy some alcohol!

True, at 18 you are allowed to vote, join the military, buy cigarettes, or be tried for crimes as an adult. However, none of those things cause cirrhosis of the liver. None of those things could lead you to possibly get behind the wheel of a car and kill someone’s child, brother, or loved one who didn’t deserve to die because you made a piss poor decision. I’ve never heard of someone going to jail or running over an innocent human for smoking a cigarette in their car, or for voting, or for being a member of the Army. What does a lowered drinking age have to do with some 18 year old kid having a “less stressful time” at college?

Do you really have to have that 12 pack of beer in your belly in order to function at the age of 18? 18 is too young to start developing alcoholism or getting dialysis treatment because your liver can’t function anymore, legal or not. The fact is, most 18 year olds are still not mature enough to understand you are behind the wheel of a moving weapon when you add alcohol to the mix of the situation of drinking and driving.

This may come off harsh but I feel no sympathy to the 18 year old kid who gets killed because they had a few too many to drink and thought they were okay to drive home and instead crashed into a tree. Or the 18 year old who is spending time in jail and has to live with it for the rest of his life that he killed someone’s family. They chose to swallow that last shot of vodka, wine, whatever… and chose to make a seriously stupid decision. Nobody force fed them that last beer and stuffed them behind the wheel of a car and said “go on with your bad self”… anyone who thinks the drinking age should be lowered has clearly not done their research on the consequences.

[43] Posted by: MandyGrits | October 14th, 2008 at 8:06 am
 

i think if parents would let kids have a sip once in a while then they would not think it’s “cool” or “bad”. i think that the age of drinking should be brought down and the driving age brought up(wait not until i am over the age of sixteen jk:)

[44] Posted by: kittykat2154 | October 14th, 2008 at 7:04 pm
 

another thing is that what if i get married at 18, i can’t even take a drink of champane at my own wedding?!

[45] Posted by: kittykat2154 | October 14th, 2008 at 7:06 pm
 

sorry last time i’ll post lol, i agree with amymac580. she said what i was trying to say only better.

[46] Posted by: kittykat2154 | October 14th, 2008 at 7:08 pm
 

Personally I think that parents should let their children have a sip every once in a while, they wouldn’t be more tempted to drink when their parents were away or not around. We just recently discussed this in my health class. I think it’s a good idea to lower the drinking age, but then again I think it’s a bad idea. There are both pro’s and con’s to this argument.

[47] Posted by: EnglandSD2108 | October 14th, 2008 at 7:09 pm
 

The legal drinking age should be raised to 18. Being underage myself, I regretfully see a lot of kids my age and younger drinking, smoking and ruining their lives because their 18 year old friends can get alcohol for them. Many of us are too young and naive to actually understand responcibility. I for one, still have much to learn, as do the rest of my peers. If the drinking age is raised to 21, less people will have less access to alcohol. Most teenage deaths result from drinking. There is a scientific reason as to why the drinking age is(should be) 21. As we grow, our minds develop a sense of understanding of society, and are mature enough to make decisions that are good for us, not just letting human nature and curiosity get in the way of our lives and how we live them. I hate to say this, but kids in America are spoiled. In Europe, there are vending machines with cigarettes, and in some countries, there is no age limit for drinking. Yet, there are less alcohol related deaths. What we need to do is instill a sense of maturity into kids, there are too many of us who take something as simple and demeaning as a bottle of beer far too lightly. I for one am tired of seeing pictures on facebook and myspace of kids getting drunk, or those same kids coming to school the next day reeking of alcohol and having a migrane due to irresponcibility. Raise the age, save a life.

[48] Posted by: Purple_Squirrel | October 19th, 2008 at 2:27 pm
 

i think dat the drinking age should be 18 cus im readii to drink ….lolsz shiid we responsible……i wanna go to da club n get fucc’d up …….

[49] Posted by: sexyteddy09 | October 24th, 2008 at 11:52 pm
 

We shouldn’t lower the drinking age because people are breaking the law! Just because people are getting arrested for underaged drinking it doesn’t mean we should lower so they will get what they want without more consequences. They are likely to get into trouble whether or not they have the legal right to drink. I feel that the legal age for possesion of alcohol should be raised to, at the very least, 25. It is reasonable and should be inforced.
be smart. don’t drink illegally.
:D

[50] Posted by: JSMCC | October 31st, 2008 at 11:16 am
 

Simply the fact that someone can go to war and die for the freedom and safety of the country is reason enough for people to able to drink at the age of 18. I think that drinking in high schools may increase because students often turn 18 during the course of thier senior year. However, I don’t think that this will have a trickle down effect and cause people to start at an earlier age. They would never take action to raise the enlistment age to 21, so why make the drinking age 21?

[51] Posted by: glakelax | November 2nd, 2008 at 3:05 pm
 

If you’re one of those people that want the drinking age lowered then everyone is gonna know that you just want a chenge like that to get drunk and no one wants a drunk 18 year old drivin’ around at night just inches away from a mass high-way death!!!!!!

[52] Posted by: gnimri | November 4th, 2008 at 7:48 pm
 

Ppl may think otherwise but I think most everybody is responsible enough at 18 to be able to drink alcohol. There are however others who will just drink a box of beer if they could. Still, there are way less ppl like that than that would only drink a bottle or two. Just because some losers decide to get drunk and get into a car crash, doesnt mean that all of us should wait another 3 years.

[53] Posted by: TheFoxOfFire | November 6th, 2008 at 11:00 pm
 

In Canada the drinking age is 18. Hell there’s so many people who come up from the states for a weekend just to get drunk because its legal up here lol. Personnally I think the drinking age should be lowered to 18 because most of us are all drinking by the time were 14. I started when I was 12… Most of the time you just kind of get a thrill about knowing your doing something illegal, lowering the drinking age would make the fun of that simmer away faster. The only thing a drinking age does is restrict you from personally buying the alcohol.
It’s stupid really

[54] Posted by: JillDaniellee | November 7th, 2008 at 1:18 am
 

soorry for the second post but
FYI- usa has the highest drinking age and the most problems… take the hint
its not that hard to figure out
and if im at a party and someone wants to toke up, and most want to drink, someones always sober with a car, kids arnt stupid we just want to enjoy ourselves
and its not that were all irresponsible and all 18 yearolds, or 15 like me.. were not idiots so STFU about that point ight?
but wha’d do i know im just canadian eh?

[55] Posted by: JillDaniellee | November 7th, 2008 at 1:33 am
 

Im 15.
Ive been s***(if i cant cus let me know) faced many time.(bout 10)
and its no smart. and my brother drives us places. usually sober. i say just keep it 21.
heh.
odd i know.
but hey, itll save many lives

[56] Posted by: kuntzi_is_emo | November 7th, 2008 at 9:32 pm
 

I live somewhere where the legal age is 18 and drink driving used to be a huge problem, but its not amongst young people anymore because theres a mentality there now that makes people lose respect for people who drink drive.
Its seen as a terrible thing to do. But people here don’t rely on cars as much as much as they do in America.

[57] Posted by: EmzyBeau | November 9th, 2008 at 4:11 pm
 

Its 18 in Ireland And People Are Drinking At The Age Of 14 Less So I Don’t Know How People Do It Till 21…:\ I Know American And Irish Drinking Cultures Are Very Different. It is Kinda Lack Of Education But Not As Much As Everyone Makes Out, Some People Just Don’t Give A Shit. They Just Want A Good Time.

[58] Posted by: AmiiAutopsy | November 11th, 2008 at 2:55 pm
 

Yeah in Ireland loads of kids are drinking really young, but again, its the whole culture, its that its forbidden until its 18 and obviously kids are going to rebel against what they aren’t allowed. I think if you took away the whole forbidden thing and made it part of everyday life like parents educating kids about drink and making them see drinking as not a big deal, they’re wouldn be such a big problem! Lower it yeah, but educate that you don’t gotta get drunk when ya drink!

Then again, the irish always love the drink….:)

[59] Posted by: cheesemongoose | November 12th, 2008 at 8:20 pm
 

Well I’m supposed to be all for it, as I’m underaged, but still; I don’t think there is the right maturity level in enough college students to be able to control themselves. It takes some kind of wise thinking to stop drinking, and all of you who do drink know what I’m talking about. We see it in the commercials, we hear it from authoritative figures, but you never fully understand the true meaning of ‘Know the one that’s one too many’. Anyways, I don’t think that people aged 18-20 know the severity of it, and shouldn’t be given the right. It’s not only about ‘exposure’ to the stuff, and it’s not just about the ‘rebel’aspect of it- It’s about being with your friends and having a real drink, as handling alcohol is a natural sign of maturity(to some people). Sure, a little bit of extra exposure to show it’s not really the bee’s knees might work, but if you’re going to go through all that trouble, I believe it’s a more suitable investment to just tighten up security at bars and such.

(This is where I insert a joke so I don’t seem like I’m a droning loser)

But I live in Ukraine(somewhere near Russia) and they let every joe-average into bars without ID. ;)

And I really look like a kid.

[60] Posted by: will__92 | November 13th, 2008 at 4:13 pm
 

The legal drinking age is a limit assigned by governments to restrict the access of children and youth to alcoholic beverages. Legal drinking ages vary from country to country,and sometimes,within a particular country.In most countries the legal age to purchase alcohol is 18,but there are considerable variations:some countries do not recognize a drinking age;others outlaw drinking;and still others,like India,mandate a drinking age as high as 25 in some states.
————————————————-
rosejenifar
DUI

[61] Posted by: rosejenifar | November 14th, 2008 at 4:45 am
 

it’s a just idea the only problem is that in the state of montana the state drinking limit is 19 so no matter what montana’s are going to be stuck with that law. and besides if the age is lowered to 18 instead of 19 or 20 then more high school seniors will be drunk durring prom, graduation, homecoming crosstown, all of the things that are really important to a senior who wants to remember his/her last year of public schooling…although most say that they won’t want to..they do

[62] Posted by: Sprolioli | November 14th, 2008 at 4:28 pm
 

Hey, if their going to drink their going to drink. Might as well make it legal!
It all depends on how one can hold their drink, and that depends on ur culture. America has no specific culture,, so…..Good luck kids!

[63] Posted by: Randypandy1 | November 14th, 2008 at 9:51 pm
 

JSMCC what are you on?

[64] Posted by: Randypandy1 | November 14th, 2008 at 9:56 pm
 

I don’t think lowering the drinking age really matters. We’ve got 12 year olds smoking pot and having sex, and letting 18 year olds “get it out of their system” could just give America some more addicts. And young adults are still too stupid to call someone to take them home. Their good, not drunk, until they kill someone while under the influence. A friend of mine was hit by a drunk driver after a football game and was admitted into the ICU. They didn’t know if he was going to make it because of the extent of his injuries.

[65] Posted by: Lauree19 | November 16th, 2008 at 1:47 pm
 

woo 4 more years and im boozin it up baby

[66] Posted by: ridge606 | November 16th, 2008 at 7:43 pm
 
 

If the drinking age was lowered, people would not abuse it so much. Look at Germany, if you are 13 and you live in Germany, you can drink all you want. The reason why the alcohol related accidents in germany are lower than in the u.s. is because drinking isn’t that big of a deal. in the u.s. drinking is referred to as a “responsible adult activity” and because of that younger kids are drinking because they want to feel more independent and grown up. in germany, drinking is referred to as a celebratory act in which you drink for leisure. when you start drinking at 13, buy 16 or 17, it’s not seen as “bad ass” or “rebellious” because when you live in germany it is perfectly legal.

[68] Posted by: Reed351 | November 17th, 2008 at 2:17 am
 

tru that all people want to do is have fun or hang with there buds and get hammerd if that happends the drinking & driveing will go down.!.

[69] Posted by: timothy4455 | November 17th, 2008 at 2:17 pm
 

Where I live the drinking age is eighteen! So hahahahaha I can go to bars and you can’t :P But in all seriousness, I was always quite conservative and had my first drink years after many of my friends. I was fifteen. It was awesome. I have abused alcohol in the past but to be honest I’ve actually drinken less since I’ve been legally allowed to, as well as less heavily. Teenagers drink, like it or not, and based on my experience they’re the most likely to overdo it. Not to mention that they get into loads of trouble like getting taken advantage of by older people who look so cool under the fuzzy lights of intoxication. And you know what? Where the age is 21 its the same. If people want something they will get it. I knew a lot more potheads though cause it was actually easier to get! Ha. So you don’t want your underage children drinking? The most effective way would probably to set a friggin example you bunch of winos! Maybe if kids didn’t see there parents drinking and having so much fun when they were young, or the booze around the house ready for the swiping they wouldn’t be so apt to want to do it. But god forbid you change your life, you want someone else to tell your kids what to do! Good job. Children learn from example and are very perceptive of parental hypocricy. Maybe thats why they always rebel? Chew on that.

[70] Posted by: MissKiss09 | November 19th, 2008 at 10:23 am
 

heck if the voting age is 18 then why isn’t the drinking age? i was born in the U.S. but part of my family is from Guatemala. the drinking age there is 18 and they have good drinking habits. one of MY family members said that they let my cousin get really drunk ONCE and they never drank that heavy again.

[71] Posted by: cornisgood | November 20th, 2008 at 6:02 pm
 

???? thats ok why? lol

[72] Posted by: kuntzi_is_emo | November 24th, 2008 at 2:56 am
 

I think that it should stay at 21. As for when you turn 18, you can go fight and die for your country. Ya… that’s true but notice the word CAN.. the real question is… Do you? Did you sign up for the military? Did you go and sign up to be on the reserve at least?
If the answer is no than F*** no you shouldn’t be allowed to drink. Sorry to be strong but if your argument is that you have the choice to sign up so you should have a beer have little in common if you don’t have the balls to AT LEAST sign up for the reserve so when your country needs you you can go fight.
If you made it through BCT, then ya, I think you are responsible enough to drink. And if you weren’t responsible enough to drink before you went through BCT, you sure as hell are once you make it out.
I think, if you are serving or did serve for your country and your not 21 yet, you should have the right to drink. if not, you can wait till your 21. I bet we’d have lots more people lining up for the Armed Forces if we told them they could drink all they want if they joined. and we’d have a lot more disciplined people, and the US would be happy. Hey, that’s a win win situation, why they haven’t done that yet is beyond be.

No, I don’t think they should lower it. Reverse Psychology does not work in cases like this. It only reverses what you think will happen. If you serve in the military, you deserve a beer, if you didn’t, you should have to wait. trust me, the reason is the same we don’t let kids become an adult at 16 just because we give them the right to drive. you gotta give it gradually to them (me included). If not, we have the same effect if you put a fish from cold water to warm water, or if you put something really hot on ice. it dies, cracks, shatters. Why? because it got too much of something too quickly. Same goes with responsibilities. you get to much at one time, you don’t know what to do with yourself, and you crack (mentally). Trust me, you need that time to adjust.

[73] Posted by: Isuppose | November 24th, 2008 at 9:13 pm
 
 
 
Post a comment
 
 
You must be logged in to SparkNotes to post a comment.
 

 
 
Contribute to SparkLife!
 
Have something to say? We want to hear it. Become an official SparkLife contributor.
 
 
Songs To Make You Feel Awkward
 
 
 
SparkLife RSS Feed
 
 
XML  Get your daily dose